Determination and prioritization of the most effective criteria in architectural design of office buildings from passive defense point of view by using AHP method

• sayed javad hashemi fesharaki ²

http://www.joem.ir/article_36766.html

Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 15
Summer and Autumn 2019

Pages 67-76

Determination and prioritization of the most effective criteria in architectural design of office buildings from passive defense point of view by using AHP method

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

• Gholamreza Jalali ¹ 
• Mojtaba Araghizadeh   
• sayed javad hashemi fesharaki ²

¹ Head of passive Defense Organization

² University of Imam Hussein (AS)

Abstract

Office buildings without regarding to their sub functions are some kinds of assets that because of being related to the governments and states and their important role in governing people affairs, had always been under different kinds of threats from airborne-missile attacks to terrorist near-by blast. Especially by increasing different kinds of attacks, including terrorist and non-terrorist attacks against political-bureaucratic buildings of our country, this issue has exposed more than ever. Hence, implementation of passive defense efforts in design and building steps of these buildings, is an essential issue. In this article, with considering of blast wave as the base threat, efforts have been done to identify and prioritize main architectural criteria in designing office buildings by using experts' opinion and Analytical Hierarchy Process after gathering data with library method and expert interview and filling in the questionnaire by 28 experts, records analyzing were done by AHP method. At last, after the assessments in research by Expert Choice 11 Software, building envelope, interior design and protected space, respectively were chosen as the most important criteria of architectural design of office building with passive defense point of view. So, efforts have been done in this article to write a comprehensive analyze for the most important indicators

Keywords

• Architecture 
• Office building 
• Threat 
• Vulnerability 
• Blast wave

---

 References

1. اصغریان جدی، ا؛ شهاب، ع. (1394).  بومی‏سازی استانداردهای پناهگاه جمعی و خانوادگی در ایران، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.
2. Bitarafan , M. Hosseini, B. hashemi-fesharaki, J. (2013). The Role of Façade Materials in Blast-Resistant Buildings, Frontiers of Architectural Research.
3. Hosseini, B. Hashemi Fesharaki, J.  Norouzian Maleki, S. (2012). The Role of Basic Forms Buildings in Explosion Protection. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology
4. معینی کربکندی، م. (1392). شاخص‏های فرم‏های معماری ساختمان‏های مقاوم در برابر موج انفجار، پایان‏نامه کارشناسی ارشد به راهنمایی آقای دکتر سید باقر حسینی، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران.
5. Pouri Rahim, A. Bitarafan, M. Lale Arefi, S. (2013). Evaluation of Types of Shapes of Building Roof against Explosion.IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1
6. Bitarafan , M. Hosseini, B. Abazarlou, S. Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2012). Selecting the optimal Composition of Architectural Forms from the Perspective of civil Defense Using AHP and IHWP methods, Architectural Engineering and Design Management And Technology (ISSN 2221-8386) Volume 2 No 8
7. . Amol.B, Salunkhe (2016). Terrorist Resistant Building Design. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing.
8. Koccaz1, Z.  Fatih, S. Torunbalci, N. (2008). ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR BLAST RESISTANT BUILDINGS, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
9. Parisi, F. Balestrieri, F. Claudio,D. (2016). Blast resistance of tuff stone masonry walls. Elsevier Engineering Structures,Volume 113, Pages 233-244
10. زبردست، ا. (1380). کاربرد فرایند تحلیل سلسله‏مراتبی در برنامه‏ریزی شهری و منطقه‏ای، نشریه‏ی هنرهای زیبا، شماره‏ی 10، تهران.
11. . Kousalya, P.  )2012(. Analytical Hierarchy Process approach – An applications.l.  Mathematica Aeterna, Vol. 2. 10, 861 - 878.
12. Sherekar,V. Tatikonda, M. )2016(. Impact of Factor Affecting on Labour Productivity in Construction Projects by AHP Method.  International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, Volume 6 Issue No. 6
13. Kokangül, A. Polat , U. Dağsuyu, C. (2017). A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Elsevier Safety Science, Volume 91, p 24-32
14. Llamas, B., Cruz Castañeda, M., Laín, C. (2017). Environ Earth Sci  76: 204.
15. Ghobadi, M.H., Taheri, M. & Taheri, K. (2017). Municipal solid waste landfill siting by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and a proposed karst vulnerability index in Ravansar County, west of Iran, Environ Earth Sci, Issue 2
16. Rakotoarivelo, Baptiste, J. (2017). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Financial Investments Using AHP. s.l. : Springer International Publishing.
17. آذر، ع. (1374). AHP تکنیکی نوین برای تصمیم‏گیری گروهی. نشریه‏ی دانش مدیریت، تهران.
18. فرزام‏شاد، م. (1386). مبانی نظری معماری در دفاع غیرعامل. مؤسسه انتشاراتی جهان جام جم. تهران.
19. هاشمی فشارکی، ج؛ محمودزاده، ا. (1391). فرهنگ توصیفی دفاع غیرعامل. انتشارات علم‏آفرین، اصفهان.
20. دفتر مقررات ملی ساختمان (1391). مبحث بیست‏ویکم (پدافند غیرعامل). تهران
21. بیطرفان، م؛ فرزام‏شاد، م. (1392). معماری همساز با دفاع غیرعامل با واکاوی در سبک‏های معماری جهان. انتشارات بوستان حمید، تهران.

 

 

http://www.joem.ir/article_36766.html